{
  "video_id": "KizQ_NFYHTY",
  "video_url": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KizQ_NFYHTY",
  "title": "Gem vs. Gem Death Match",
  "channel": "Gemstones",
  "channel_id": "UC9depPiZijkug50cDGvIGow",
  "channel_url": "https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC9depPiZijkug50cDGvIGow",
  "published_date": "",
  "duration": "5:04",
  "duration_seconds": 304,
  "views": 780403,
  "likes": 0,
  "description": "Are you ready to rumble?! This week, Natalie pits gemstone against gemstone for a battle of the century! Color, hardness, tenacity, and more will determine who will win this collision of gem titans. Watch as stones collide to learn just which gemstone will come out on top! \n\nFor more info on #Diamonds : https://www.jtv.com/library/gemopedia/diamond\nFor more info on #Emeralds : https://www.jtv.com/library/gemopedia/emerald\nFor more info on #Jade : https://www.jtv.com/library/gemopedia/jade\nFor more info on #Aquamarine : https://www.jtv.com/library/gemopedia/aquamarine\nFor more info on #Quartz : https://www.jtv.com/library/gemopedia/quartz\n\nSubscribe to JTV: http://www.bit.ly/subscribejtv\nCheck out JTV's Gemopedia: http://www.jtv.com/library/gemopedia\n\n#JTV is one of the leading experts on gemstones and is the best source on YouTube for all things gem related. Featuring gem history, the science behind the stones, #gemstones in pop culture, and much more, you too can become a gem expert by immersing yourself in JTV’s channel. Natalie, our host, is a Graduate Gemologist and an Applied Jewelry Professional.\n\n\nWebsite: https://www.jtv.com/gemstones?mcid=XSOyt\nFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/jtvgems/?mcid=XSOyt\nTwitter: https://twitter.com/jewelry?mcid=XSOyt\nInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/jtvgems?mcid=XSOyt\nSisk Gemology Reference: http://www.jtv.com/sisk-gemology-reference.html?mcid=XSOyt\n\n\n#Diamonds #Emeralds",
  "language": "en",
  "auto_generated": true,
  "segments": [
    {
      "text": "If you're a fan of Pokémon Go, I'm sure",
      "tc_in": "0:00.000",
      "tc_out": "0:04.360"
    },
    {
      "text": "you know all about gym battles. It's",
      "tc_in": "0:02.000",
      "tc_out": "0:05.920"
    },
    {
      "text": "where you take your little friends you",
      "tc_in": "0:04.360",
      "tc_out": "0:07.200"
    },
    {
      "text": "captured against their will and make",
      "tc_in": "0:05.920",
      "tc_out": "0:09.400"
    },
    {
      "text": "them fight each other. They gain skills,",
      "tc_in": "0:07.200",
      "tc_out": "0:11.400"
    },
    {
      "text": "you level up, and it's an overall great",
      "tc_in": "0:09.400",
      "tc_out": "0:13.440"
    },
    {
      "text": "time. Lucky for the Pokémon, they aren't",
      "tc_in": "0:11.400",
      "tc_out": "0:15.400"
    },
    {
      "text": "actually real, so their enslavement is",
      "tc_in": "0:13.440",
      "tc_out": "0:17.600"
    },
    {
      "text": "entirely fictional. And lucky for you,",
      "tc_in": "0:15.400",
      "tc_out": "0:20.360"
    },
    {
      "text": "it's not 2016 and this isn't an episode",
      "tc_in": "0:17.600",
      "tc_out": "0:22.120"
    },
    {
      "text": "about Pokémon. If you want to watch one",
      "tc_in": "0:20.360",
      "tc_out": "0:24.320"
    },
    {
      "text": "of those, try this one. But we're not",
      "tc_in": "0:22.120",
      "tc_out": "0:26.480"
    },
    {
      "text": "going to have gym battles, we're going",
      "tc_in": "0:24.320",
      "tc_out": "0:30.480"
    },
    {
      "text": "to have gem battles.",
      "tc_in": "0:26.480",
      "tc_out": "0:30.480"
    },
    {
      "text": "SEE, I HAD A PLAN THE WHOLE TIME. You",
      "tc_in": "0:35.600",
      "tc_out": "0:40.000"
    },
    {
      "text": "shouldn't have doubted me. But before we",
      "tc_in": "0:38.280",
      "tc_out": "0:41.800"
    },
    {
      "text": "keep going, I want to thank you guys for",
      "tc_in": "0:40.000",
      "tc_out": "0:44.360"
    },
    {
      "text": "taking a moment to click on that bell so",
      "tc_in": "0:41.800",
      "tc_out": "0:46.600"
    },
    {
      "text": "you know every time we release a new",
      "tc_in": "0:44.360",
      "tc_out": "0:49.120"
    },
    {
      "text": "video. First in the octagon that I",
      "tc_in": "0:46.600",
      "tc_out": "0:52.440"
    },
    {
      "text": "assume sits atop a brilliant cut stone",
      "tc_in": "0:49.120",
      "tc_out": "0:54.440"
    },
    {
      "text": "are the mighty emerald and the awesome",
      "tc_in": "0:52.440",
      "tc_out": "0:56.440"
    },
    {
      "text": "aquamarine. Both of these gems are",
      "tc_in": "0:54.440",
      "tc_out": "0:58.760"
    },
    {
      "text": "varieties of beryl, which evens the",
      "tc_in": "0:56.440",
      "tc_out": "1:00.840"
    },
    {
      "text": "playing field a bit. But there are a",
      "tc_in": "0:58.760",
      "tc_out": "1:02.960"
    },
    {
      "text": "couple of key differences that may give",
      "tc_in": "1:00.840",
      "tc_out": "1:05.519"
    },
    {
      "text": "one of the stones an advantage. The bold",
      "tc_in": "1:02.960",
      "tc_out": "1:07.240"
    },
    {
      "text": "greeniness of emerald is certainly",
      "tc_in": "1:05.519",
      "tc_out": "1:09.880"
    },
    {
      "text": "impressive and some might argue is more",
      "tc_in": "1:07.240",
      "tc_out": "1:12.120"
    },
    {
      "text": "striking than the color of aquamarine. A",
      "tc_in": "1:09.880",
      "tc_out": "1:14.080"
    },
    {
      "text": "famous Roman historian once said of",
      "tc_in": "1:12.120",
      "tc_out": "1:16.960"
    },
    {
      "text": "emeralds, "Nothing greens greener." But",
      "tc_in": "1:14.080",
      "tc_out": "1:18.720"
    },
    {
      "text": "the stone's toughness or resistance to",
      "tc_in": "1:16.960",
      "tc_out": "1:20.560"
    },
    {
      "text": "breakage is generally less than that of",
      "tc_in": "1:18.720",
      "tc_out": "1:22.960"
    },
    {
      "text": "aquamarine despite clocking in around an",
      "tc_in": "1:20.560",
      "tc_out": "1:25.280"
    },
    {
      "text": "eight on the Mohs hardness scale. This",
      "tc_in": "1:22.960",
      "tc_out": "1:27.480"
    },
    {
      "text": "also makes finding high clarity emeralds",
      "tc_in": "1:25.280",
      "tc_out": "1:29.040"
    },
    {
      "text": "really challenging, which is why the",
      "tc_in": "1:27.480",
      "tc_out": "1:30.920"
    },
    {
      "text": "purest of emeralds can be hecka",
      "tc_in": "1:29.040",
      "tc_out": "1:33.560"
    },
    {
      "text": "expensive. Some unearths emeralds have",
      "tc_in": "1:30.920",
      "tc_out": "1:35.640"
    },
    {
      "text": "exhibited a radial or spoke pattern",
      "tc_in": "1:33.560",
      "tc_out": "1:38.040"
    },
    {
      "text": "called a trapiche emerald. While I'm not",
      "tc_in": "1:35.640",
      "tc_out": "1:39.680"
    },
    {
      "text": "sure this gives the emerald a strategic",
      "tc_in": "1:38.040",
      "tc_out": "1:42.320"
    },
    {
      "text": "advantage over aquamarine, it may make",
      "tc_in": "1:39.680",
      "tc_out": "1:44.320"
    },
    {
      "text": "the opposing stone green with envy,",
      "tc_in": "1:42.320",
      "tc_out": "1:46.120"
    },
    {
      "text": "which brings me to emerald's formidable",
      "tc_in": "1:44.320",
      "tc_out": "1:48.320"
    },
    {
      "text": "crystalline opponent, aquamarine. The",
      "tc_in": "1:46.120",
      "tc_out": "1:50.960"
    },
    {
      "text": "blue hue always comes from iron ions and",
      "tc_in": "1:48.320",
      "tc_out": "1:52.800"
    },
    {
      "text": "its shade depends on whether it's iron",
      "tc_in": "1:50.960",
      "tc_out": "1:55.080"
    },
    {
      "text": "two or combination of iron two and",
      "tc_in": "1:52.800",
      "tc_out": "1:56.160"
    },
    {
      "text": "three.",
      "tc_in": "1:55.080",
      "tc_out": "1:57.680"
    },
    {
      "text": "This gives the stone a strategic",
      "tc_in": "1:56.160",
      "tc_out": "1:59.800"
    },
    {
      "text": "advantage over emerald. Though both",
      "tc_in": "1:57.680",
      "tc_out": "2:01.320"
    },
    {
      "text": "stones are about an eight on the Mohs",
      "tc_in": "1:59.800",
      "tc_out": "2:03.280"
    },
    {
      "text": "scale, aquamarine isn't nearly as",
      "tc_in": "2:01.320",
      "tc_out": "2:05.600"
    },
    {
      "text": "brittle as emerald. So a swift kick to",
      "tc_in": "2:03.280",
      "tc_out": "2:07.480"
    },
    {
      "text": "the girdle would do more damage to an",
      "tc_in": "2:05.600",
      "tc_out": "2:10.000"
    },
    {
      "text": "emerald than an aquamarine. But a slight",
      "tc_in": "2:07.480",
      "tc_out": "2:11.480"
    },
    {
      "text": "edge on strength isn't the whole",
      "tc_in": "2:10.000",
      "tc_out": "2:14.200"
    },
    {
      "text": "picture. One could argue that this comes",
      "tc_in": "2:11.480",
      "tc_out": "2:16.120"
    },
    {
      "text": "down to a beauty contest. While a",
      "tc_in": "2:14.200",
      "tc_out": "2:18.120"
    },
    {
      "text": "faceted aquamarine is stunning, its",
      "tc_in": "2:16.120",
      "tc_out": "2:20.600"
    },
    {
      "text": "color usually isn't as bold as a vibrant",
      "tc_in": "2:18.120",
      "tc_out": "2:22.920"
    },
    {
      "text": "green emerald. If you want a blue that",
      "tc_in": "2:20.600",
      "tc_out": "2:24.600"
    },
    {
      "text": "blues like emerald's green, you'll have",
      "tc_in": "2:22.920",
      "tc_out": "2:27.240"
    },
    {
      "text": "to look beyond aquamarine. Wow, I turned",
      "tc_in": "2:24.600",
      "tc_out": "2:29.120"
    },
    {
      "text": "into Dr. Seuss there for a second. Now,",
      "tc_in": "2:27.240",
      "tc_out": "2:30.960"
    },
    {
      "text": "I'm not pooh-poohing on our friend",
      "tc_in": "2:29.120",
      "tc_out": "2:33.440"
    },
    {
      "text": "aquamarine. The subtle hue of this stone",
      "tc_in": "2:30.960",
      "tc_out": "2:35.880"
    },
    {
      "text": "is still striking. This is simply where",
      "tc_in": "2:33.440",
      "tc_out": "2:38.360"
    },
    {
      "text": "gem battles get subjective. So let me",
      "tc_in": "2:35.880",
      "tc_out": "2:40.240"
    },
    {
      "text": "know in the comments which gem you find",
      "tc_in": "2:38.360",
      "tc_out": "2:42.360"
    },
    {
      "text": "superior. But that's not all, we",
      "tc_in": "2:40.240",
      "tc_out": "2:44.120"
    },
    {
      "text": "actually have a triple threat match",
      "tc_in": "2:42.360",
      "tc_out": "2:48.280"
    },
    {
      "text": "between diamond, quartz, and jade.",
      "tc_in": "2:44.120",
      "tc_out": "2:49.520"
    },
    {
      "text": "There's an old saying amongst",
      "tc_in": "2:48.280",
      "tc_out": "2:51.400"
    },
    {
      "text": "gemologists, "If you hit a diamond with",
      "tc_in": "2:49.520",
      "tc_out": "2:53.040"
    },
    {
      "text": "a hammer, it'll shatter into a dozen",
      "tc_in": "2:51.400",
      "tc_out": "2:55.120"
    },
    {
      "text": "pieces. Hit a piece of quartz with a",
      "tc_in": "2:53.040",
      "tc_out": "2:57.480"
    },
    {
      "text": "hammer, it'll split in two. Hit a piece",
      "tc_in": "2:55.120",
      "tc_out": "2:59.440"
    },
    {
      "text": "of jade with a hammer, it'll ring like a",
      "tc_in": "2:57.480",
      "tc_out": "3:00.680"
    },
    {
      "text": "bell."",
      "tc_in": "2:59.440",
      "tc_out": "3:02.520"
    },
    {
      "text": "Diamond gets a lot of credit for being",
      "tc_in": "3:00.680",
      "tc_out": "3:04.880"
    },
    {
      "text": "the hardest gem, but if it's more prone",
      "tc_in": "3:02.520",
      "tc_out": "3:07.240"
    },
    {
      "text": "to shatter, how's that possible? This",
      "tc_in": "3:04.880",
      "tc_out": "3:09.120"
    },
    {
      "text": "comes down to a misunderstanding of the",
      "tc_in": "3:07.240",
      "tc_out": "3:11.440"
    },
    {
      "text": "term hardness in gemology, which is what",
      "tc_in": "3:09.120",
      "tc_out": "3:13.200"
    },
    {
      "text": "may give diamond's competitors an",
      "tc_in": "3:11.440",
      "tc_out": "3:15.720"
    },
    {
      "text": "advantage. We saw this a little bit in",
      "tc_in": "3:13.200",
      "tc_out": "3:16.880"
    },
    {
      "text": "the matchup between emerald and",
      "tc_in": "3:15.720",
      "tc_out": "3:18.920"
    },
    {
      "text": "aquamarine, two stones of similar",
      "tc_in": "3:16.880",
      "tc_out": "3:21.080"
    },
    {
      "text": "hardness, one being more brittle than",
      "tc_in": "3:18.920",
      "tc_out": "3:23.320"
    },
    {
      "text": "the other. In layman's terms, hardness",
      "tc_in": "3:21.080",
      "tc_out": "3:25.360"
    },
    {
      "text": "really just means scratchability.",
      "tc_in": "3:23.320",
      "tc_out": "3:27.240"
    },
    {
      "text": "Diamond being the least scratchable gem",
      "tc_in": "3:25.360",
      "tc_out": "3:29.320"
    },
    {
      "text": "out there and talc being so scratchable",
      "tc_in": "3:27.240",
      "tc_out": "3:31.440"
    },
    {
      "text": "you can do it with your fingernail. Any",
      "tc_in": "3:29.320",
      "tc_out": "3:33.280"
    },
    {
      "text": "stone that's higher on the Mohs scale",
      "tc_in": "3:31.440",
      "tc_out": "3:35.800"
    },
    {
      "text": "can scratch any softer stone on the same",
      "tc_in": "3:33.280",
      "tc_out": "3:38.400"
    },
    {
      "text": "scale. A diamond can scratch both quartz",
      "tc_in": "3:35.800",
      "tc_out": "3:40.560"
    },
    {
      "text": "and jade. A quartz can scratch jade, but",
      "tc_in": "3:38.400",
      "tc_out": "3:42.800"
    },
    {
      "text": "jade can't scratch quartz or diamond and",
      "tc_in": "3:40.560",
      "tc_out": "3:45.200"
    },
    {
      "text": "quartz can't scratch diamond. Wow, that",
      "tc_in": "3:42.800",
      "tc_out": "3:46.840"
    },
    {
      "text": "felt like a word problem, but you get",
      "tc_in": "3:45.200",
      "tc_out": "3:49.120"
    },
    {
      "text": "what I mean. So, let's get back to the",
      "tc_in": "3:46.840",
      "tc_out": "3:50.760"
    },
    {
      "text": "proverbial hammer and say it has a",
      "tc_in": "3:49.120",
      "tc_out": "3:53.560"
    },
    {
      "text": "hardness of five or six. That hammer",
      "tc_in": "3:50.760",
      "tc_out": "3:55.600"
    },
    {
      "text": "isn't scratching anything, but it could",
      "tc_in": "3:53.560",
      "tc_out": "3:57.600"
    },
    {
      "text": "certainly shatter the diamond because of",
      "tc_in": "3:55.600",
      "tc_out": "4:00.760"
    },
    {
      "text": "its low tenacity or resistance to blows.",
      "tc_in": "3:57.600",
      "tc_out": "4:02.920"
    },
    {
      "text": "On the tenacity scale, these stones rank",
      "tc_in": "4:00.760",
      "tc_out": "4:05.160"
    },
    {
      "text": "in the opposite direction. Jade has an",
      "tc_in": "4:02.920",
      "tc_out": "4:07.680"
    },
    {
      "text": "extremely tough tenacity, quartz has a",
      "tc_in": "4:05.160",
      "tc_out": "4:09.960"
    },
    {
      "text": "moderately tough tenacity, and diamonds",
      "tc_in": "4:07.680",
      "tc_out": "4:12.160"
    },
    {
      "text": "are comparatively brittle. This evens",
      "tc_in": "4:09.960",
      "tc_out": "4:14.160"
    },
    {
      "text": "out the playing field a bit. One could",
      "tc_in": "4:12.160",
      "tc_out": "4:15.720"
    },
    {
      "text": "argue that since most people aren't",
      "tc_in": "4:14.160",
      "tc_out": "4:17.720"
    },
    {
      "text": "hammering their gemstones and scratching",
      "tc_in": "4:15.720",
      "tc_out": "4:19.160"
    },
    {
      "text": "is a far more likely hazard to",
      "tc_in": "4:17.720",
      "tc_out": "4:21.400"
    },
    {
      "text": "encounter, diamond still may have the",
      "tc_in": "4:19.160",
      "tc_out": "4:24.160"
    },
    {
      "text": "strategic edge. But if our friends jade",
      "tc_in": "4:21.400",
      "tc_out": "4:27.960"
    },
    {
      "text": "and quartz decide to tag in Mr. Hammer,",
      "tc_in": "4:24.160",
      "tc_out": "4:30.480"
    },
    {
      "text": "then diamond better watch his pavilion.",
      "tc_in": "4:27.960",
      "tc_out": "4:32.960"
    },
    {
      "text": "Which gem do you think would come out on",
      "tc_in": "4:30.480",
      "tc_out": "4:35.240"
    },
    {
      "text": "top? Is this the most expensive fight",
      "tc_in": "4:32.960",
      "tc_out": "4:37.040"
    },
    {
      "text": "between inanimate objects you've ever",
      "tc_in": "4:35.240",
      "tc_out": "4:38.920"
    },
    {
      "text": "imagined? Let us know down in the",
      "tc_in": "4:37.040",
      "tc_out": "4:40.360"
    },
    {
      "text": "comments and don't forget to like and",
      "tc_in": "4:38.920",
      "tc_out": "4:42.240"
    },
    {
      "text": "subscribe. For more information on",
      "tc_in": "4:40.360",
      "tc_out": "4:44.040"
    },
    {
      "text": "hardness and tenacity, check out the",
      "tc_in": "4:42.240",
      "tc_out": "4:46.400"
    },
    {
      "text": "links below. Thanks for watching.",
      "tc_in": "4:44.040",
      "tc_out": "5:05.390"
    },
    {
      "text": "[Music]",
      "tc_in": "4:46.400",
      "tc_out": "5:05.390"
    }
  ]
}